Saturday, May 2, 2020

Sullivan Examined The Impact Governments †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Sullivan Examined The Impact Of The Governments? Answer: Introduction In the article, author Sullivan examined the impact of the governments, investors, and role of the various other non-governmental organizations on combating the climate change. As a response the organizations has adopted crucialmeasures in order to reduce the toxic emissions enhanced approaches in combating the carbon and energy management practices (Matten et al, 2008).In the end, a constructive qualitative data is utilized to draw evidence upon the emerging relationships. Main Body Thisarticle examines the role of theexternalgovernance in combating and aligning enhanced measures in order to control the toxic emissions. The external governance can further influence the internal government in adopting a significant corporate strategy (Neugebauer et al, 2016). This article examines the case of the international retailers prevailing conditions under which the national government played a critical role while combating the climatic changes. It utilises specific strategies which are adopted by the companies in reducing the greenhouse emissions. It was widely observed, that corporations only invest capital in the scenarios pertaining to financial cases which require an immediate action. Considering a financial case, an external government can pressurize the companies to take transformative actions. Also it happens, if the financial case is constrained due to funding, than the approaches to inculcate the nonstate actors, in order to, bring the radical changes within the companies to limit the use of Account. The other articles which are written on the same topic are by the author Malte Anderson (2016) which has addressed a similar concern of involving the business regulate emissions through carbon pricing (Andersson et al, 2016). Other examples of a similar article, written are by the Author Jonatan Pinske (2012) which emphasis on the multi stakeholder partnerships roles in addressing the climatic concerns (Pinkse et al, 2012). The previous research was mainly focused on the key role of the people their participation within it. At later stages, it was evident that the government business play a crucial role in combating the environmental hazards to a great extent. The contributions it makes in the field are the key emphasis on the role of the non-governmental which can combat the green house emission gas various other environmental pollutants. The limitation of the article is to understand the gaps in order to determine the governance process work. The strength of the article is theestablished theory, upon which it correlates to follow the empirical validity. The weakness within the article is the conflicting evidences and literature which provides an opportunity for the other researchers to explore it (Marchi et al, 2013). Conclusion The ideas pertaining to the expansion of the greenhouse gas emission limits use of the best energy management practices can have a serious implications repercussion effects. The author examines the role of the government corporate response towards the steps taken to control the climate change. Earlier it was researched that only citizens have a key role in controlling emissions. At later stages, it was evaluated that it is due to the government non-governmental organization upon which the corporate takes necessary steps in combating emissions (Levy et al, 2003). References Andersson, M., Bolton, P., Samama, F. (2016). Governance and Climate Change: A Success Story in Mobilizing Investor Support for Corporate Responses to Climate Change. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 29-33. Levy, D. L., Egan, D. (2003). A Neo?Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations.Journal of Management Studies,40(4), 803-829. Marchi, V. D., Maria, E. D., Micelli, S. (2013). Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains.Business strategy and the environment,22(1), 62-72. Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility.Academy of management Review,33(2), 404-424. Neugebauer, F., Figge, F., Hahn, T. (2016).Planned or emergent strategy making?Exploring the formation of corporate sustainability strategies. Business strategy and the environment,25(5), 323-336 Pinkse, J., Kolk, A. (2012).Addressing the climate changesustainable development nexus: The role of multistakeholder partnerships.Business Society,51(1), 176-210.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.